Into the Wild
By: Jon Krakauer

I got “Into the Wild” for Christmas and read it almost right away. On the surface it should have everything I’d be interested in, adventure, the outdoors, environmentalism and a little but of mystery; but I finished the book feeling unsatisfied.
Into the Wild is the story of Christopher McCandless aka Alex Supertramp who is a free spirit at heart. He chafes under the light hand of his parents and disdains his upper-middle class upbringing yearning instead for the freedom of the road and the life of a vagabond. Unlike most people with similar yearnings he actually took off and lived the life he was dreaming of, burning his car, burning his money and hitching rides wherever the mood took him. He would work odd jobs and sleep under overpasses or camp out and for the most part fell out of mainstream society. In the end his journey took him to Alaska on a quest to survive in the bush on nothing but his wits and some very meager supplies.
Sounds great right? Well, a lot of things irked me about this book. First off Krakauer has a lot of filler material to get this book thick enough to be considered novel-length. He goes off on tangents about other people who “walked into the wild” and he also recounts one of his own ill conceived adventures in the Alaskan mountains. These side trips, which are great for adding inches, detract from the main story by watering down the adventure and the quest. It is clearly filler, and filler annoys me!
I think everyone knows how the story ends, if you’ve read the book or seen the movie or even seen the trailer you know so I’m hopefully not spoiling this for anyone. He dies in Alaska, starves to death through a really odd series of events; although I do love the irony that he gave almost $24,000 to OXFAM, a charity that works with world hungry. We start the book knowing about his ultimate end, and I think this reasonable since it provides a frame of reference for the story and allows the mystery to unfold. From a purely literary standpoint it wouldn’t be as good a story if he didn’t die!
The problem with him being dead though is that really makes me angry! I am excited that he lived life the way he did, that he took the chances he did and chased after the things he wanted, even if he was a little maniacal about it. I am angry that he lost touch with all of the important people in his life and I’m angry that he was so focused on the “free spirit” experience that his lack of preparation killed him! If he had the sense to take a map along he would be alive today… of course, taking the map along would defeat the purpose in his mind.
I wouldn’t recommend this book to someone, although the subject matter is excellent and obviously thoroughly researched it falls flat in the telling and leaves me angry at both Krakauer and McCandless.